I was surprised to discover that iCab (âThe Internet Taxi For Your Macâ) is still around! Way back when, it was an indie browser for macOS. These days the engine is WebKit, and it has a bunch of little usability tools, like pop-out windows that will show an outline of a page based on the headings, or a list of all the links on a page, etc.
It doesnât support Chromium or Firefox extensions, but it has its own âmodulesâ that can modify the page, or send it to a web application, or help you debug, or download the page as a PDF, etc. There are a few obsolete items in there like Google+ and StumbleUpon, which does make me wonder how current the rest are. I havenât been able to get the save-to-Pocket module to work, for instance. But it does let you set up bookmarklets, which puts it ahead of NetSurf.
Iâve found that I like the idea of iCab better than I like actually using it. Itâs not bad, itâs just OK. Then again, with so many other browsers trying to grab your attention and data, sometimes âjust OKâ is what you want!
Retro-computing enthusiasts, take note: Old versions for Macintosh System 7.5-9 and earlier versions of OSX are still available for download, though theyâre no longer updated or supported.
The default home page is the most cluttered home page I have ever seen on a web browser. Definitely more than a default Firefox full of Pocket recommendations. Possibly including the bad old days of Netscape 4 and everything wanting to be a âportal.â And frankly, Iâve never had the page full of Pocket recs slow things down the way that Edgeâs home (embedding MSN news) does. Fortunately itâs a single click to turn it off, but itâs a really bad first impression.
Edge syncs settings, bookmarks, addresses, and, well, as much as it can through a Microsoft account. And it really, really wants you to sign into a Microsoft account and use Copilot and so forth, even more than Chrome wants you to sign into a Google Account these days. (And thatâs saying something.) Itâs compatible with Chromium extensions, but would rather you install add-ons through its own store. Portable Web Apps (PWAs) install and run fine while online, but seem to have trouble with offline support.
Once you turn off all the Microsoft specials, it feels usable again â but then, itâs just another Chromium skin. Maybe you want to keep a few Microsoft features turned on? Integration with the Family Features or desktop search, maybe? And there are some things you canât turn off completely.
Weirdly enough, thereâs still an âIE Modeâ available for compatibility in the Windows 11 version!
And yeah, I have to specify the Windows version again, because itâs available on macOS andâŠhilariouslyâŠon Linux too! You donât have to run it through Wine for testing! (Though itâs Blink anyway). The Linux releases are still Intel/AMD-only for now, but Microsoft provides a Debian package, and thereâs a Flatpak that wraps it for other distros!
Basic camera app with support for flash, timer and video. Saving EXIF metadata is optional, as is adding GPS location to it. Doesnât have HDR, night sight or even panorama capability. Does OK in good lighting conditions. You can set the JPEG compression quality, which is nice, though even at 90% its images are slightly noisier than Googleâs camera app on the same phone. Presumably itâs doing less post-processing. Still good for snapshots or iNaturalist observations.
When you really want (or need) to stay private while using the web, Tor is the way to go.
Private windows in normal browsers only âhideâ your activity from other websites and your history. VPNs only hide your activity from whoeverâs providing your internet connection. Even blocking trackers (or all third party cookies) like LibreWolf and Brave or using Privacy Badger do only goes so far (though itâs certainly a good start). (Speaking of Brave, that browserâs âTor modeâ is less thorough than the real thing.)
Drawbacks
The privacy does come at a cost, though:
Tor bounces your activity around through multiple relays, kind of like chaining several VPNs together, to hide where youâre connecting from, which slows things down.
The browser removes features that can be used to âfingerprintâ your setup (even more than LibreWolf does), so sites that use those features or info for legit purposes canât.
While it supports Firefox extensions, they recommend not installing any in order to avoid adding more attack surface or (again) fingerprinting data.
Some websites block access from Tor because attackers also use it to hide who and where they are.
What itâs For
OK, so itâs inconvenient for everyday browsing or shopping. But if you need to hide your tracks from a stalker or abuser, a harassment campaign, an abusive company with network access, an oppressive government agency, or just a nosy sysadmin, Tor can help you do that.
Tor can also get around network-level censorship to some extent, both with regular websites that might be blocked and by connecting to âonionâ sites, websites hosted on the TOR network.
Even then, someone with access to your network traffic can still see that you are using TorâŠjust not what youâre doing with it. Snowflake and bridges are add-on layers designed to help disguise that further.
Using It
Itâs built on Firefox, so [most of that review applies] as far as actually using it goes, both on desktop and Android. The hardening approach makes the experience a bit more like LibreWolf or IronFox. Sometimes youâll get the wrong localization of a site depending on where the exit node ends up (like using a VPN, except with a VPN, youâre usually picking the exit yourself).
The browser is available on Windows, macOS, Linux (though not on ARM yet) and Android (you can add a repository to F-Droid). Thereâs no iOS version, but they recommend Onion Browser (iOS) and Orbot (not a browser, but proxies apps like a Tor VPN on both iOS and Android).
A privacy-hardened Firefox variation for Android, comparable to LibreWolf on desktops. It removes Mozilla tracking and services like Pocket, but keeps sync (which is end-to-end encrypted) and local translations (which happen on your device). Like LibreWolf, it disables or narrows some features that can leak data, but those changes can break some websites.
Using it is similar to using mobile Firefox, and virtually identical to using mobile Waterfox. Iâm trying both out on the same phone and I sometimes forget which one Iâm using. The biggest noticeable differences are that Waterfox doesnât currently support local translations, and IronFox doesnât support WebGL unless I dig through advanced settings to re-enable it.
Even then, Iâve still had trouble with a few sites failing to work correctly. The worst is when an error pops up at the end of a checkout process, and you canât be sure whether the order didnât get created, or the response didnât make it to your phone â and Iâve had both happen just in the past few days.
IronFoxâs web presence is minimal â mainly its Gitlab repository and mirrors. I imagine this is at least in part because itâs (sort of) a new project, picking up the Mull browser from DivestOS, which was discontinued in December. Itâs not on Google Play, but itâs on several alternative app stores, including F-Droid (you need to add their repo), Accrescent and Obtanium.