I was preparing my latest favorite work-suitable drink a few minutes ago, and a drop of tea spilled over the side of the mug and ran down to the base. Naturally it immediately spread around the entire base, forming a ring on the desk. It was easily wiped up, but then I thought—why does it always spread around the entire base to form that unmistakable coffee ring?

It occurred to me that it might just be capillary action with the liquid flowing along the V-shaped channel formed by the table and the edge of the mug. Some googling did turn up the fact that ring-shaped coffee stains from single drops are caused by capillary flow: as the drop evaporates, it draws water from the inside.

But the instant ring from the mug? Either it’s something else, or it’s so obvious no one has throught it worth writing about.

Edit: *sigh* Read first, then post. I was just reminded that capillary action specifically refers to fluid moving against gravity. Any other thoughts?

6 thoughts on “Coffee rings caused by capillary action?

  1. The mug exerts a stronger gravitational force than the air particles near the surface of the table?

    Or… most cups and mugs taper inward, so by the time the drop has raced to the bottom it has centripetal momentum?

  2. “capillary action specifically refers to fluid moving against gravity”… eh? A capillary is just a small channel – capillary action could be in any situation. The difference between the lesser surface energy of the mug and the coffee and the greater surface energy of the table and the coffee will be enough to cause the coffee to minimise the energy and flow around the edge of the mug, under gravity.

  3. Should’ve gone with my first reaction. Chalk that one up to poorly-worded articles on the Internet and a fuzzy memory of old high school science classes.

  4. Yup, that’s definitely capillary action, or at least it’s caused by the same physical reasons.

    Essentially, what’s happening is that the water is in a lower-energy state when it’s against certain kinds of solid surfaces (such as glass and ceramic) than when it’s in the middle of the drop. So, if you stick a glass tube in some water, there’s this balance between the water wanting to creep up the glass so more of it is against the surface, and gravity wanting to pull it back down, and it ends up in a position where those two things balance out.

    In the coffee-ring situation, gravity doesn’t balance it, so it just keeps going until it’s covered as much solid surface area as it can. (What eventually balances it there is the fact that water-air surface has higher energy, and so it doesn’t do things that increase that very much. That’s why it only wets the area where the coffee cup is nearly touching the table.)

    There’s a related common experiment, where you put a drop of water on a clean glass surface, and a drop on a waxed surface. The water-glass surface is a low-energy state, and so the drop spreads out to get a lot of it. The water-wax surface is a high-energy state, and so the drop beads up to touch very little of it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.