You needed to fix your car. You could have gone to the established shop, but the new guy told you they were crooked. You went with the new guy.
Now he’s stripping your car, telling you he’s doing a great job & complaining about the cops investigating a stolen car parts ring.
Those “Call one number and we’ll connect you to key decision makers on this issue” campaigns are convenient, but I wish more of them would…
Show a list of all the people they’re going to connect you to. I’d like to know how many calls I’m making before I start.
Mark which lawmakers are already co-sponsors so we can adjust our message between “thanks for supporting” and “please support.” Sure, I can look it up, but the whole point is to make this easier.
Update the campaign as things change. One wanted me to call my state reps, but copied and pasted the information from a federal bill on the same issue. And it included my senator, even though the bill had already passed the senate and was in the assembly. I took one look at the misdirected talking points and ignored them. I also skipped calling the senator who had already voted for a bill that had already passed that chamber. I wonder how many people cared enough about the issue to call, but relied on the campaign for the specifics, and ended up calling the wrong people about the wrong bill?
Step 1: Refuse to confirm a SCOTUS judge for a year.
Step 2: Install a judge you prefer.
Step 3: Get a SCOTUS ruling upholding a voter purge law that disproportionately impacts people who are more likely to vote for your opponents.
Voter purges aren’t about getting rid of invalid registrations. They’re about suppressing votes. The US, unfortunately, has a long history of finding ways to disenfranchise a group without explicitly identifying them. Look up where “grandfather clause” came from.
The modern version is subtler, but it works like this:
You want more people from group A to be able to vote than group B. Find some classification that applies to more members of group B than group A. Target that classification, and you change the balance of the electorate.
What Ohio did was notice that members of one major party tend to vote in every election, while members of the other tend to skip elections where they don’t feel they have a good choice.
Technically they targeted occasional voters.
Effectively they targeted a political party.
A family member was incorrectly removed from the voting rolls. She hasn’t moved in about 7 years, hasn’t done anything to lose eligibility, and has been active in every election during that time. Even the local ones.
She cast a provisional ballot and is trying to sort out what the hell happened to her registration.
Lessons learned:
What happened?
It’s not clear what caused her case, but she was far from the only one with similar problems in this election.
Santa Clara county dropped voters from the rolls through a broken de-duplication effort. And in Los Angeles County, over 100,000 registered voters are missing from the rosters due to a “printing glitch.”
I don’t like to be paranoid, but one of the two major political parties in the US loves suppressing voter participation in areas and demographics that lean toward the other party.
And San Jose and Los Angeles do lean toward that other party.
Imagine a dangerous road curve. Do you blame the drivers and call it a day? After all, not everyone crashes over the edge or into oncoming traffic.
Or do you bank the turn, calculate a safe speed limit and add a railing?
It won’t stop all crashes, but it’ll reduce them.
Re-engineering the road doesn’t ignore the driver’s decisions, but it acknowledges that they don’t happen in isolation. Change the circumstances, and you change how many drivers crash and burn.
