Category: Tech

Posted on
by

Since I started converting parts of my website to use 11ty as a static site generator, I’ve been able to automatically generate tag and category pages that are *just there* as plain html files. And since they’re plain HTML, the old local site search engine I have on there still finds all the Eleventy-generated pages. And again since it’s all static, it doesn’t go down when the database does (which has been happening on an annoyingly frequent basis lately).

And this would be perfect if I was using a single Eleventy instance to build the entire site, but I’m not. I’ve got separate instances building the Les Misérables blog, the reviews, the tech tips, the creative writing collection, and so on, plus I have this WordPress blog and a bunch of hand-coded HTML from the old days.

Which leads to a few problems:

  1. Tags are per-section, not universal.
  2. The site search, which indexes html files on the server, sees everything except the WordPress posts, and the WordPress search *only* sees the WordPress posts.

Some ideas I’ve had to combine the tag pages:

  • Rebuild everything in a single Eleventy instance with a deeper hierarchy. Upside: Still static pages for everything except WordPress. Downside: Time-consuming, still leaves the main blog separate.
  • Write a post-build script that combines all the the tag pages from each subsite. Upside: Same. Downside: Need to either run on the server or make sure my local copies of the *other* subsites are current.
  • Write a server-side page that combines the backend HTML pages into a dynamic frontend for only the tag being viewed. Upside: simple. Downside: tag pages now depend on PHP.
  • Write some client-side JavaScript for the tag pages that will check whether other subsites have tag pages, and add those to the end of the list in a “See also…” section. Upside: simple, and the “local” tag pages are still usable as long as I make sure the script doesn’t block anything. I could even have it check the other static subsites first and then check the blog, so if the blog times out I still display everything else. Downside: requires JavaScript and additional network requests. But as long as I stick to vanilla JS, I can make it pretty small.

And for unifying the search:

  • Write a post-site-indexing script that adds the WordPress posts to the index. Could be done with direct DB access.
  • Write a pre-site-indexing script that generates a bunch of files for it to index. Seems like overkill.
  • Update the search code to send the same search terms to WordPress and combine the results.
  • Use a new search engine that indexes the served pages instead of the files on the server.
  • Point the search box at a remote search engine like Googl…yeah, never mind.

I haven’t settled on anything. I’m just kind of writing down ideas in public. If you have any suggestions, please let me know!

Posted on
by

Looks like IEEE has finally renamed their sustainable tech conference. Now it’s “IEEE SustainTech Expo.” Not only is it a bit clearer than the old name, but ever since Among Us came out, “SusTech” always made me giggle a bit. I doubt I was the only one.

Update: apparently I was mistaken, and SustainTech is entirely separate from SusTech, which is still going on. Looking at it a bit more, it seems that SustainTech is more of a marketing/trade show, while SusTech continues to be a technical conference.

Posted on
by

Found the eclipse glasses from 2017. Checked for scratches. Looks like they’ll be usable for Saturday’s solar eclipse!

It’ll be partial here in California, covering ~78% of the sun’s diameter. The annular shadow passes from Oregon diagonally to Texas, crosses the gulf to Yucatan, then follows Central America and crosses Brazil from west to east at its widest part.

Time and date calculator for when it starts, peaks and ends in your area, and how much of the sun will be covered.

Posted on
by

Popped over to Twitter to delete the last handful of posts I left there when I deleted most of them back in December. Decided to leave two for now, though I might still delete them before the new TOS takes effect.

Oct 2008:

If only the super high-tech jet fighters had identified, clarified & classified, they’d have seen the attack for what it really was.

Nov 2022:

Weird, it’s almost like the needs of a “town square” for people to communicate and exchange ideas aren’t compatible with the incentives for a single for-profit entity to maintain it.

Posted on
by

This is fascinating: Researchers looked at variations in the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) genes of people who had confirmed cases of Covid before the vaccine rollout and also had genetic records on file.

Those with a particular variation were twice as likely to have been asymptomatic.

Having that same variation from both parents made them 8.5 times as likely to have been asymptomatic!

They looked at two more cohorts and found the same results.

And then they looked at T-cells collected before the pandemic, and found that the ones with this allele responded more actively to SARS-COV2, despite never having been exposed to it before. That lends weight to the hypothesis that some people’s immune systems were able to recognize it as similar to more run-of-the-mill coronaviruses.

Next they want to broaden the study more to include people with a wider range of ancestry.

It doesn’t come close to explaining all asymptomatic cases, and they didn’t look at how it might stack with immune responses that are actually targeted at covid (vaccines, prior infections), or whether it also reduces the chances of long-term damage from covid.

But wouldn’t it be great if someone could come up with a supplement based on what this HLA variant produces that’ll cause your immune system to generalize better? Even if it’s just within coronaviruses?

Posted on
by

I think there’s been a lot of talking past each other on privacy lately because there are so many layers to it.

Google or Dropbox keeping your cloud files from showing up on someone else’s drive or a public share is one layer. Keeping your data from leaking in a data breach is another. Protecting messages in transit from your device to their service. Google and Meta (Facebook, Instagram, and now Threads) are good at those.

But then there’s ensuring that Google or Meta doesn’t misuse it themselves, or sell it to someone who will.

And, well, to put it mildly, they’re not so big on that aspect!

Continue reading →

Posted on
by

Imagine a small village near a valley, so isolated that they just call themselves “the people.” One day they find out about another village on the other side of the valley, and they start calling them “the people across the valley.” They can keep talking about “the people,” but sometimes they need to make a distinction: right now, we’re talking about the people on *this* side of the valley, not the people on both sides.

Not incidentally, the Latin prefixes for “this side of” and “the other side of” are cis- and trans-. English uses trans more frequently, as in transport, transform, transmit, transnational etc., all of which involve something crossing a divide. Sometimes it’s quite literal, like the old terms Transjordan and Cisjordan referring to the lands on the far and near sides of the Jordan river. Or more modern terms, like the cis- and trans- forms of a molecule that can have more than one structure. Or in space exploration, translunar space (beyond the moon) and cislunar (including the moon’s orbit and Lagrange points). (Who’s that contractor for the new moon missions, again?)

Come to think of it, the moon’s another good example of the same sort of thing. When we’re just talking about life here on Earth, we can say “the moon” and it’s clear which one we mean. But if we’re talking about the whole solar system, and how Earth’s moon compares to Titan or Europa, we have to specify which one we mean.

So if we’re talking about transgender people and their experience compared to non-transgender people and their experience, the clear term to use based on English grammar is cisgender, and just as transgender is often abbreviated as just “trans,” cisgender is abbreviated as “cis.”

It’s a description, just like “acoustic guitar.” They’re still guitars, but when you need to talk specifically about non-electric guitars vs. electric ones, that’s the term we use.

“Cisgender” or “cis” isn’t a slur, no matter what Twitter’s owner thinks. It’s not casting negative judgement any more than “acoustic” is casting negative judgment against the guitar, or insisting that space on one side of the moon is better than the other.